logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.10.27 2014고단1562
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around February 3, 2010, the Defendant committed the crime of fraud against the victim D, which was operated by the victim D in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, stated, “FFFn's debt guarantee was made by the victim, and the victim was attached to the head of the Tong only within that time. At this point, the Defendant made a deposit with the victim. At this point, the Defendant loaned money to the head of the Tong. There is also an insurance policy for the teaching life deposit, and there is an orchard in the Cheongong, and there is also an amount corresponding to the head of the Tong, and there is a deposit corresponding to the deposit amount in the head of the Tong, and there is no sufficient means to repay.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not own an orchard, and did not have a considerable amount of deposit. At that time, G was liable for approximately KRW 60 million, and there was no intention or ability to repay the amount even if he borrowed money from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as such, received KRW 136,335,00 from April 8, 2013, a total of 52 times, as shown in the attached Table of Crimes (1) from the time of deceiving the victim, and received KRW 4 million from the victim, namely, from the victim who was affiliated with it, from the victim.

2. Around July 13, 2007, the Defendant committed the crime of fraud against the victim G was “IC mountain,” located in the area of “ICK H, Cheong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun,” and false statement was made to the victim G that “A East borrowed a siren from Seoul, and he was suffering from a siren for a period not exceeding one year. If the Defendant was erroneous, he should sell it for a long time, and was drinking and telephoneed.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as such, received a total of KRW 30 million from the time of deceiving the victim and receiving KRW 3 million from the victim, i.e., from the victim, from the time of 2007, to the time of A, from the time of 2007, as shown in the List of Crimes (2).

arrow