The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

No person shall damage a voting paper.

Nevertheless, on May 9, 2017, the Defendant, at the second polling station of D middle school E, which is located in Boh City, around 07:50 on May 9, 2017, destroyed the form of ballot, which was cited as the reason that the voting clerk prevented him from waiting close, while his spouse puts in the balloting booth at the balloting booth.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A letter of confirmation prepared by the F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each letter of confirmation prepared by G and H;

1. Article 244 (1) of the relevant Act concerning facts constituting a crime and Article 244 (1) of the Act on the Election of Public Officials in Charge of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)

1. Penalty fine of 2,500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (the following grounds for sentencing) of the suspended sentence

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Fines of 2.5 million won to 15 million won;

2. The sentencing criteria are not set; and

The crime of this case is against the peace of voting by tearing the form of voting at the voting place where the election for public office, which is the basis of democratic politics, and thereby hindering the smooth performance of election affairs, and the quality of the crime is less severe.

shall not be deemed to exist.

However, when the defendant was forced to wait close to his spouse in the process of voting together with his spouse, he brought about a contingent crime of this case.

The intention or political purpose of interfering with election affairs at the time seems to have no intention or political purpose, there was no other disturbance, and there is no little degree of interference with election affairs.

The defendants recognize all their mistakes and are in profoundly against themselves.

The defendant is only punished by a fine twice for a crime of 13 years prior to the crime of this kind.

2.2