Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date of the final judgment of this case, the Defendants are above.

Punishment of the crime

As a kind of relationship with C, the Defendants, while driving a Done Star vehicle under the name of C Co., Ltd., sold ethyl ethyl-rating (tamping with ethyl apparatus or drainage) which was found rapidly below the E located in Namyang-si, and conspired to raise living expenses.

1. Defendants from around July 22, 2019 to around 23:22.

7. From 23:00 to 00:06, Defendant A driven the said vehicle D Lone Star Co., Ltd., and Defendant B arrived at the said place, and then cut off approximately 100 ethyl ethyl activities on the part of the injured party, which were installed on the water distribution channel, of the South-North Korean viewing (Ga 1mx 60cm in length, 33.5 km in weight) on the part of the injured party, including 1m x 60cm in length, 33.5 km in weight, 5,00 in the market value) on the back of the said Lone Star Co., Ltd. and on the back of the said vehicle.

2. From around 05:21 to 05:26 on July 24, 2019, the Defendants: (a) committed a theft by means of transferring approximately 10 x 60 cm in length, weight 3.5 km (34,00 won in the market price) to the back seat and the animal partitions of the said Lone Star vehicle and loading them on the back seat of the said Lone Star vehicle.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. A H statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 331(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants subject to discretionary mitigation: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants on probation: (a) the Defendants’ grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act recognize and reflects their mistakes; (b) Defendant B did not have any particular criminal records other than once a fine due to drunk driving; and (c) Defendant A also did not have any specific criminal records other than the one-time suspension of indictment due to assault.