1. The Defendants jointly do so to the Plaintiff:

(a) 60,747,200 won and the year from November 11, 2017 to April 4, 2019.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 15, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendants and the Defendants on the condition that they lease Class 2 neighborhood living facilities (public notice source) of Grade 2, 3, and 4 above ground (hereinafter “instant public notice source”) from July 15, 201 to July 14, 2016, with the period from July 15, 2011, to July 14, 2016, KRW 80 million, monthly rent of KRW 550,000 (excluding value-added tax), management expenses (excluding value-added tax), monthly rent of KRW 50,000 (excluding value-added tax) (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). At that time, the Defendants received delivery of the instant public notice source from the Defendants, and conducted the public notice source business at the said store.

B. On August 8, 201, the Defendants filed a complaint against the Plaintiff, and settled on the premise that the term of lease under the instant lease agreement was from July 15, 201 to July 14, 2017.

(Seoul Central District Court 201No. 1419) c.

On May 22, 2017, the Defendants sent a notice to the Plaintiff that they had no intent to extend the instant lease agreement, which reaches the Plaintiff around that time.

【Unfounded grounds for recognition】 The facts without dispute, Gap's 1 through 3, 6 evidence, Eul's 4 (including each number, if any, hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the claim for damages equivalent to the premium

A. On June 12, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) concluded a contract to transfer the right to operate the instant Institute’s goodwill, facilities, and fixtures at KRW 170 million in premium; (b) the Defendants refused to enter into a lease agreement with E without justifiable grounds under each subparagraph of Article 10-4(2) of the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act (hereinafter “Commercial Building Lease Protection Act”); (c) the Defendants are obliged to pay the Plaintiff KRW 86,616,070, the premium value at the time of the termination of the instant lease agreement, as compensation for damages under Article 10-4(3) of the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act.

For this reason,