Defendant

A The defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50.

Punishment of the crime

[2012 High Court Decision 1922]

1. Defendant B, around April 23, 2012, at the management office of the second apartment E in Gwangjubuk-gu, Gwangju, the head of the management office of the said apartment, assaulted the victim F by putting the victim F, who was dissatisfied with the issue of dismissal of the victim F, the head of the management office of the said apartment.

2. At around 10:19 on the same day, Defendant A, at the place specified in the preceding paragraph, had the victim F, who was disputing the issue of dismissal of the victim F, laid down the victim FF on the ground floor by breaking the victim F, and breaking the victim F into the ground floor, thereby causing injury to the victim F for about two weeks of medical treatment.

[2012 high-level 1976] Defendant A, around 17:00 on June 19, 2012, sought to resist the notification of the victim F to the police by the Defendant who assaulted D at around 13:30 on the same day, and Defendant A used the victim F’s face at one time by drinking the victim F at one time, and assaulted the victim F’s face at one time.

[2012 high-level 1977] Defendant B is the general secretary of the council of occupants' representatives of the second E apartment in Gwangju Northern-gu, and Defendant A is the auditor.

On February 13, 2012, the Defendants prepared documents in the above apartment management office, and prepared a proposal to dismiss the head of the management office, and made it available for perusal by the representatives of the occupants of the above apartment, the residents of G, and H.

On November 18, 201, the above documents asserted that the water tank cleaning problem and the trial price and the repair and maintenance expenses are not distinguished, and the removal would be caused, and the residents instigate it. 2. On November 3, 201, the above documents filed a complaint with the police station for the purchase of clothes at the expense and the collection related to the purchase of clothes, and the embezzlement and assault of the general affairs, rather than 4 weeks after the filing of a complaint with the police station (on the present prosecutor’s investigation).