logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.29 2014나50066
잔여지매수
Text

1. At the request of the plaintiffs that changed in exchange at the trial, the defendant, upon the request of the plaintiffs:

A. Plaintiff F 1,216,292 and others.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Seoul Regional Land Management Agency, which was implemented around 1990 to 1991, was incorporated into a site for the “Cheongcheon-gun Restoration Works” which was owned by the Ministry of Construction and Transportation (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. The Defendant deposited KRW 3,784,100,00 as compensation money on the ground that the Defendant could not hold consultation due to the unknown address and residence of the landowner (C) in accordance with the procedures prescribed by the Special Act on the Acquisition of Land for Public Use and Compensation for Loss, following the procedure of service by public notice in lieu of consultation. On December 31, 1991, the Defendant deposited KRW 3,784,100,00 as compensation money on the ground that the name of the person who is to receive the deposited goods is “the name of the person who is to receive the deposited goods” under the Friju District Court No.701, Dec. 31, 1991, in light of the respective descriptions in the Friju-gun, E No. 2, and E No. 3 (Closed Copy).

C. C died on November 20, 198, and on the instant land, on May 10, 1985, the transfer registration of ownership was completed on the ground of donation made on May 10, 1985.

(Yiju District Court No. 2631, Dec. 16, 1994) d.

On the other hand, on May 27, 2013, the Seoul Regional Land Management Office, under the Defendant, requested A to hold a consultation on compensation for losses on the ground that the area of 1,964 square meters per Dong-gun, Gyeonggi-gun, K was incorporated into “Cheongcheon-gun River Maintenance Project,” and A filed a claim for the purchase of the instant land as the said project site. The Seoul Regional Land Management Office’s compensation for the instant land to A on July 1, 2013 is above B.

The reply was made to the effect that additional compensation is not possible as it was deposited as stated in the subsection (hereinafter referred to as the “instant reply”).

E. Upon receipt of the instant reply, A filed a claim for withdrawal of the said deposit money (the principal amount of KRW 3,784,100,000, plus interest accrued until February 1, 2002; hereinafter “instant deposit”). However, the Defendant on July 10, 2013.

arrow