logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.05.22 2019고단5560
전자금융거래법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall intermediate a third party's communications using telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator or provide such means for any third party's communications, and no one may lend a means of access by receiving, demanding or promising any third party to receive any consideration, unless otherwise specifically provided for in other Acts.

Nevertheless, on February 2019, the Defendant came to contact with a name-free person who became aware of through the Internet B, at the early place of the police station, through the Internet B B, and accepted a proposal to create and lend a transaction performance by sending a mobile phone core chip, an OTP card, etc.

On February 11, 2019, at around 14:00, the Defendant sent an application for subscription to the Internet phone (D and E) prepared under the name of the Defendant via facsimile at the place where the above person was instructed by the above person. On February 26, 2019, at around 19:00, the Defendant sent an application for subscription to the Internet phone (D and E) via facsimile. On February 26, 2019, at around 9:32 Gwangju Central Bus Terminal, as the name of the Defendant was opened in the name of the Defendant, the core chip of the cell phone (F) opened in the name of the Defendant at the Gwangju Central Bus Terminal and theOTP card connected with the G Bank Account (Account Number H) in the name of the Defendant, the number of accounts opened in the name of the Defendant and the number of accounts opened in the name of the respective G Bank (H) and the number of accounts opened in the name of the Plaintiff, around March 14, 2019.

Accordingly, the Defendant provided telecommunications services provided by telecommunications business operators for the purpose of telecommunications and provided the means of access with the promise of intangible profits that can receive a loan.

arrow