logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.07.05 2017고단1321
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person engaged in driving a vehicle BM520 in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from dangerous driving).

On January 20, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 01:55, and got three-lanes in front of the distance for viewing both South and North Korea at the time of two weeks from the boundary of the two weeks to the parallel of the two-lanes.

Since the location was an intersection where signal lights are installed, the driver of the motor vehicle shall not drive the motor vehicle while normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, and there was a duty of care to make sure that the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to properly manipulate the traffic situation and prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went to turn to the left at the front by the negligence of violating the signal while driving in a state where it is difficult for the Defendant to drive in a normal and right-hand manner, and brought to the left at the right-hand turn in the face of the victim C (58 years old) who is driving by the victim C (58 years old) who was driving by the left-hand turn in accordance with the new code.

Ultimately, due to the above occupational negligence, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as cerebral salins, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

2. On the day specified in paragraph (1), the Defendant driven the said BM520 vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.197% from the 4-meter section to the place where the accident described in paragraph (1) 1 occurred, both of which were driven by the Defendant, in a state of alcohol alcohol of approximately 0.197%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A report on traffic accidents and a survey report on actual condition;

1. An accident scene photograph;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. A report on whether to drive any danger;

1. A report on the detection of a primary driver;

arrow