Text
All of the plaintiff's lawsuits against the defendants are dismissed.
The costs of lawsuit are D principal E, expressed as the representative of the plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a religious organization established around 1955 and registered as a Buddhist organization in Seoul Special Metropolitan City on November 2, 197.
The deceased H was dead on March 26, 2017, when it was in the position of the Plaintiff’s clan (the state of law, hereinafter referred to as “patho”) from around 1977.
B. The main contents of the Plaintiff’s religious donation are as follows.
Article 20
1. The end of a political party shall be elected by the Recommendation Committee, and the end of a political party shall be approved by the recommendation committee for the end of a political party upon the recommendation of the end of a political party;
2. Members recommended by the final-recommended council shall be elected by the final council from among those who are recommended by the final council or literature council and who are frightly and have rendered distinguished services;
Article 68
1. A proposal of a final constitutional amendment shall be made by not less than 1/3 of all the members of the final decision or the final decision;
2. A resolution on a final amendment of the Constitution shall require the affirmative votes of at least 2/3 of the closing session;
3. The final constitutional amendment bill shall be declared by the president of the Constitutional Court.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2 and 7 (if there are virtual numbers, including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The plaintiff's assertion deprived of the defendant C's deceased status. The defendant C, not the plaintiff's deceased status, is no longer entitled to the plaintiff's deceased status and as the chief director of the defendant foundation corporation, which is its affiliated organization, and the defendant C is not in the above position. The decision to elect the defendant C as the chief director of the defendant foundation Eul is no longer effective.
3. Determination as to the defendants' main defense
A. The defendants' assertion D is unlawful since it is not the representative of the plaintiff lawfully elected. The lawsuit of this case is filed by a person without the power of representation.
B. According to the evidence, Gap evidence, evidence Nos. 9 and 10 as seen earlier, and the purport of the entire pleadings, the Emergency Countermeasures Committee was established under the initiative of D, etc. on March 19, 2019, and on April 10, 2019, by the above Committee, elected D as a final decision in accordance with the religious amendment and amendment. However, the above Committee voluntarily created D, etc.