A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than four months and a fine not exceeding three hundred thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 02:10 on August 14, 2015, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by referring to the victim’s 'Cju’ that the Defendant was exposed to the disturbance B 4th floor of Won-si, and received 112 reports from the victim E, who is the head of the police station affiliated with the D District Unit, and without any justifiable reason, the Defendant was aware of the victim’s 's hump, i.e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., f., f., f., f., bitch.’

2. Around 02:40 on August 14, 2015, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) under the influence of alcohol at a district unit of the original police station D district located in G in the original city, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, led the police officers of the said district; (b) fluencing the police officers of the said district; and (c) fluencing them with the intent to walk the table on the way to walk and walk on the road; and (d) flucing them into a riotous horse or behavior at a public office, with the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E statements;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of CCTV images to D District CCTV);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for a crime, and Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of cancellation by government offices and the selection of fines);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the favorable circumstance that the defendant reflects the error.

However, on June 13, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months as of June 13, 2014 and is currently under suspension of the execution. However, the Defendant committed the instant crime of insulting a police officer even though he/she should be aware of the fact that he/she was sentenced to a fine and was sentenced to a fine even around November 2014, which was after the said judgment was sentenced.

In addition, the defendant is arrested as a flagrant offender at the scene of the crime, and is in the earth.