logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.01.25 2018가단258634
신용카드이용대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 44,400,879 and KRW 43,857,434 among the Plaintiff’s KRW 23.5% per annum from October 5, 2018 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

(However, "creditor" is deemed to be "Plaintiff" and "debtor" to be "defendants". 2. The defendant raised an objection by being served with the original copy of the payment order under Article 208 (3) 2 and Article 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act. However, the above written objection is only stated in the purport of objection against the payment order, but does not constitute a reply under Article 256 of the Civil Procedure Act because there is no specific statement as to the content of dispute over the plaintiff's claim, and the defendant did not submit a written answer, and the defendant did not appear on the date for pleading. In such a case, the confessions under Article 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act are established (see Supreme Court Decision 89Meu4045 delivered on July 25, 198).

arrow