The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant reflects on the crime.

However, even though the defendant had committed the same crimes, he again committed each of the crimes in this case.

Since drinking and unlicensed driving crimes are likely to cause serious damage to other road transport users, it is necessary to punish them accordingly.

In addition, considering all other circumstances such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure). (In accordance with Article 25(1) of the same Act, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 5 million due to a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving on November 21, 2006) in the case of a violation of the Road Traffic Act ( Drinking) at the subsidization of the Suwon Friwon Friju, and issued a summary order of KRW 5 million on December 11, 2012.

“Change to “ shall be corrected to mean a change.”