Text
1. On December 12, 2012, the Defendant: (a) on the portion of 1/2 out of the 1654 square meters in Pyeongtaek-si Co., Ltd., the Suwon District Court: (b) on the part of the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On October 2006, the Plaintiff received investment proposal from Nonparty D, who is the Defendant’s husband, to jointly purchase KRW 1,250,000,000 from Pyeongtaek-si C, and agreed to purchase KRW 1,250,000,00,000,000 around that time, and paid KRW 475,00,000 to D.
B. As to the instant land, on January 12, 2007, the establishment registration of a mortgage of KRW 980,000,000,000,000,000 around the debtor D, the Hywon-based Agricultural Cooperative (hereinafter “Yeungsan Agricultural Cooperative”), the maximum debt amount of KRW 98,000,000,000,000,000,000 (hereinafter “B-mortgage”), was completed on January 15, 2007, the establishment registration of a mortgage of KRW 1,50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 was completed on January 15, 2007, the debtor E, F, the mortgagee, the defendant, and the maximum debt amount of KRW 1,70,000,00,000,000,000,00 for the Plaintiff’s share of the debt.
C. As to the instant land, the registration of ownership transfer under the Plaintiff’s name was completed on August 7, 2009, July 24, 2009, 1/2, and 1/2 of the shares in the Defendant’s name (receiving No. 35927), and on the same day, the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff of the right to collateral security, the Plaintiff of the right to collateral security, the Plaintiff of the right to collateral security, and the maximum debt amount of KRW 500,000,000 (hereinafter “non-permanent collateral security”).
(n) The establishment registration of a mortgage in the nearest amount of KRW 500,000,000,000 (hereinafter referred to as “nive security”) for the debtor, the debtor, the Dog
In each end, (Receipt No. 35928, 35929) and (2) the above (Receipt No. 35929) were cancelled, and (3) the above (Receipt No. 35930, 35931) was cancelled on August 17, 2009, and (4) the Plaintiff paid a loan interest of KRW 195 million (the Defendant’s share of KRW 57.5 million), which is the Plaintiff’s share, at D’s request.
Of the land of this case, the defendant's share 1.