The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

[Judgment on the Reasons for Appeal] The summary of the Reasons for Appeal (based on the reasoning for Appeal) was that the Defendant: (a) had taught F (the age of 52), while teaching F (the age of 52), had confirmed F’s exhaustion and smelled in the sound part; and (b) had collected F’s fingers from F with F’s consent; and (c) did not put F’s fingers in the sound part against F’s will.

The summary of the facts charged in the instant case and the summary of the judgment of the lower court in the instant indictment, the Defendant, at around 09:20 on December 4, 2012, committed an indecent act against the victim F, who displayed the successful bid at the first successful bid conclusion room located in Pyeongtaek-si D.

The defendant, under the pretext of informing the victim of the successful bid, exceeded all clothes and placed them on a place, and divided the victim's chest by hand, and divided the victim's chest by hand.

The defendant tried to find a blood job, and called the victim's bridge to be punished, and put the victim's own fingers into the sound part of the victim.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

The lower court determined that: (a) the victim’s statement appears to be reliable; (b) the victim’s statement appears to have high credibility; (c) it is difficult to view that the victim was in a state of inconvenience, inconvenience, and fluorial condition; and (d) it was the first and second in a marina room that did not have a sanitary facility; and (c) it was difficult to view that the Defendant permitted the Defendant to put his fingers directly into the drinking part while demanding treatment; (c) it was deemed that the Defendant was off his clothes to the customer before the instant case, or did not have written the drinking paper in such a state; (d) even if the Defendant taught the drinking paper to the victim, the act and process itself are very exceptional; and (d) even after the victim was subjected to an indecent act by the Defendant, the victim paid a teaching fee to the recipient with the Defendant, G, etc. at the same marina room even after he was subjected to an indecent act by the Defendant.