All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the argument that the sentencing of both rooms is unfair) that the court below rendered is too heavy or unfasible to the sentence (one year and four months of imprisonment, confiscation).

2. We also examine the argument that the Defendant and the prosecutor’s sentencing are unfair.

There are favorable circumstances such as the defendant's recognition of each of the crimes of this case and the attitude against it.

However, the crime of this case is a so-called " Bosing," which actually causes damage to an unspecified number of victims, which is difficult to recover in a planned and systematic manner, and its nature is very poor, and the defendant served as a liability to withdraw cash in the crime of Bosing. The role of the defendant is that the role is less than that of the defendant.

In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant cannot be deemed to have been punished several times in the past; (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime at the same time during the period of repeated crime; (c) the victims did not take any measures to recover damage; and (d) the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, details and details of the crime; and (e) other circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing indicated in the record, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed appropriate; and (c) it is deemed that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too heavy or too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant and the prosecutor's argument are without merit.

3. In conclusion, since all appeals filed by the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit, they are all dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.