All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles, the defendant found him guilty on the premise that Co-defendant B (hereinafter referred to as "Co-defendant B") started to commit robbery and did not start robbery by taking part of the knife the knife the knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife. However, even though the victim escaped to B before leaving the gas sprayers as it was, and the defendant did not escape to B before leaving the knife with his knife with his knife with his intent to commit robbery, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles on the commencement

The prosecutor asserts that the sentence of imprisonment (two years and six months of imprisonment) imposed by the court below is too unjustifiable and unfair, and the defendant asserts that the defendant is too unreasonable.

In light of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, the Defendant and B conspired to collect money due to lack of living expenses, and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court. At around 04:45 on the day of the commission of the crime, it was found that the victim, who is the place of the crime, has 4 times away from age and 20,000 won, and thus, it was possible to lend cash as a security, and it was repeated whether it was possible to lend money to the Defendant as security, and even though having been paid several attentions, it was turned out to the safeer who did not allow the customer access, and the victim was satisfying from the right credit of the victim.