1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. Litigation costs shall be borne by the Plaintiff

1. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the Plaintiff is the patentee of each patented invention C (name of the invention: D) and E (name of the invention: F) and the owner of each registered utility model G (name of the registered utility model). The Defendant is obliged to pay KRW 100,000 to the Plaintiff for compensation for damages arising from the infringement of the patent right and utility model right, as the Plaintiff violated the Plaintiff’s respective patent rights and utility model rights by manufacturing and selling the English learning machine called “I using the learning method.”

2. The judgment and the conclusion are that the Plaintiff did not appear at all the date of pleading more than four times after the fact that the presiding judge clearly identified the method of working the Defendant on the first date of pleading, and accordingly was ordered to prepare for the patented invention and registered utility model, and that there was no assertion or proof.

The evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant worked each of the Plaintiff’s patented inventions or registered utility model, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim based on the premise that the defendant infringed the plaintiff's patent right or utility model right cannot be accepted, and it is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.