logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2013.09.05 2013고단329
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 20, 2013, at around 12:05, the Defendant driven a 125cc c Stock with no number plate in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.134% in the section of approximately 1k from the front of the central restaurant located in the Mapo-dong, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si to the front of the apartment house.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving a 125 cc otobs without a license plate.

On January 20, 2013, under the influence of alcohol with 0.134% of blood alcohol concentration, the Defendant driven the above Oral Ocean and proceeded with the national highway No. 14 in front of the Mapoma or apartment house located in the Gyeongnam-si, Gyeongnam-si, Gyeongnam-do.

In this case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brakes well, and to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so under the influence of alcohol and received all the poles on the right side of the driving direction of the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as colons and felama, which require approximately eight weeks of medical treatment to the victim C (the age of 28) who was on the part of the Defendant’s occupational negligence.

3. A motor vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is prohibited from being operated on the road. However, the Defendant, around 12:05 on January 20, 2013, driven a 125cc c ob, without a number plate owned by the Defendant, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, from the front of the central restaurant located in the roof-dong, Gyeongnam-si, Gyeongnam-si, to the rooftop Ri in the same Dong or the front road of the apartment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. A written appraisal of blood alcohol concentration;

arrow