The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (the imprisonment of six months, the suspension of execution of two years, the observation of protection, the order to attend a law-abiding lecture for forty hours, the order to provide community service for forty hours) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected, and that the representative of the company in which the defendant is employed wanting to take the defendant's prior action on the ground that the defendant is a technical human resources necessary for the company, etc. are favorable to the defendant.

However, even though the Defendant had been sentenced to a fine twice due to driving under the influence of alcohol in 2008 and 2011, the Defendant was driving under the influence of driving under the influence of alcohol and led to the instant crime, and the alcohol concentration in blood is 0.115% low.

In full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, family relationship, motive for committing an offense, etc., the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed to be unfair because it is too unreasonable. Thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.