Defendant

The sentence of sentence against A shall be suspended.

Defendant

The prosecution against B is dismissed.

1. On September 25, 2018, at around 02:55, the Defendant 1: (a) d'D' in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the front side of the ‘D' road; (b) fing the horses of the victim B (the age of 23) who flickly flicked the horses of the victim B (the age of 23) “the same drink” from E; and (c) flicked the horses of the victim to E without a blicker, and prevented the victim from doing so; (d) flicked the victim’s blick, the victim’s blicked the victim’s blicked blicked flick on his hand, and flicked the victim’s blicked flick flick and damaged the flick flick on the part of the

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. The defendant A and his defense counsel asserts that the defendant's act does not constitute an assault, and even if the defendant's act constitutes assault, it is not an act of self-defense.

In light of the relevant evidence, it is difficult to view that the Defendant’s scambling the victim’s scambling, etc. on the ground that B did not mislead E, and even if the Defendant’s scaming the victim’s scambling, it constitutes an act of preventing an unlawful attack against the victim, even if the Defendant’s scambling the victim’s scamb

However, in light of the above evidence and related images, B was under the influence of alcohol, and it appears that it is difficult to exercise serious violence because friendly women prevented the victim from committing an act. However, the Defendant’s act of causing the victim to commit an act of aiding and abetting the Defendant’s breath, which goes beyond the degree of preventing the victim’s act, and which goes beyond the extent of defense.