Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On December 22, 2014, around 15:20 on 15:20, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the cases of obstruction of performance of official duties against 2014 High Court Nos. 18, 2014 High Court No. 1677 B, which was located 34 Doo-ro 34 Doo-ro,

The Defendant testified that “I would like to memory the police officer’s hands-on of the police officer who was cited by the Defendant while taking a bath to the police officer” by the prosecutor, and that the prosecutor testified that “I would not have any desire. I would like to do so,” ② continue to answer the prosecutor’s question “I would have no fact that the Defendant would not respond to the police officer’s demand for drinking,” and ③ there is no question, “I would like to answer the latest call contact with the Defendant or text message with the police officer.”

However, on April 10, 2014, the Defendant was aware of the fact that, while driving a vehicle B on behalf of a citizen of the 81st Government Station at the 1st Government Station at the 81st Government Station, the police officer was aware of the fact that the police officer took the hand of the crackdown police officer at the time, and the Defendant said that he would not comply with the demand for drinking alcohol at the time, and the Defendant was sent a telephone call, such as making B and B conversations, even on December 16, 2014, immediately before the testimony.

Ultimately, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocols of examination of witnesses;

1. Each police statement made to C, D, and A;

1. A letter of arrest of a flagrant offender;

1. Each investigation report (Attachment of judgment on the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties by B, and confirmation of the detailed conversations with B);

1. Results of notification of communications data;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 152(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 152(1) of the Criminal Act, which recognize and reflects the facts of the crime of this case, and the obstruction of performance of official duties of B, which the defendant testified.