The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. As to the summary of the grounds for appeal, the part of the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant, although according to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the defendant could have acknowledged the fact of taking money by threatening the victim, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant of this part of the facts charged is erroneous in matters

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in the verdict of innocence is as follows: (a) the victim C (in female, 21 years of age) entered the Republic of Korea through a disguised marriage; (b) the victim shall extend the visa with the consent of the defendant; (c) the victim must return to Vietnam without the visa extension; and (d) around December 2010, the victim made a report to the police at a cafeteria-dong, Ansan-si, Ansan-si, Ansan-si, Seoul Metropolitan City, on the victim’s commercial name, “I will not extend the visa if I would know the visa. I will report it to the police; hereinafter the victim will report it to the police; and (d) on that spot, on April 3, 2011, the victim was 10,000 won in cash from the victim; and (e) on the outside of the Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Eup-dong, and reported it to the police; and (e) the victim will not extend the visa by getting the victim to know the victim’s friendly account to the police branch of Incheon.”

B. In light of the following circumstances, the lower court acquitted the victim, D, and F on the ground that it is difficult to believe the statements of the victim, D, and F as they are, or their statements alone are insufficient to recognize that the victim paid money in the state of appearance by intimidation of the Defendant, and that there is no other evidence to acknowledge them.

(1) The victim at the police first refers to the defendant.