A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 23, 2017, the Defendant rejected the victim’s request for eviction from the victim D, who was the managing warden of the above apartment, even though he was under the influence of alcohol at the Busan apartment parking lot around 07:32, the Defendant did not comply with the victim’s request for eviction from around 08:10 on the same day.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the above time, place, and at the above 112 report, arrested the police officer F, etc. belonging to the E District of Busan, who did not comply with the eviction from the police officer F, etc. belonging to the E District of Busan, and was arrested as the current offender, and boarding the patrol car and the police officer G, etc., who was going to go to the E district of the above E, shall be

One person will be aware of if he dies.

“A police officer’s legitimate performance of duties on the handling of 112 reports was obstructed by putting a fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoring fluoral fluoring fluoring fluoring the right part of the G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and G;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 319(2) and 319(1) of the Criminal Act (in the case of refusing to withdraw), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (in the case of failing to perform official duties), and Articles 136(1) (in the case of failing to perform official duties), and

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Obstructing the legitimate execution of official duties for the reason of sentencing Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act should be punished strictly, and the attitude of the crime is also extremely poor.

However, in light of the fact that the defendant seems to have an attitude against the defendant, the fact that there is no previous conviction of a fine on two occasions due to the violation of road traffic laws, the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and means of the crime and the result of the crime, etc., the execution of punishment shall be suspended at once only once, taking into account various sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments in this case, such as the circumstances after the crime.