1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff and the defendant are relatives of the fourth degree of relationship, and specific family relations are as follows.

C (Evidence) D (O) D (O) D (O) F G G G H G G H G G G G G G G G G (T) G (T) G (T) (T) the Plaintiff LM N P PR T spouse and other relatives are omitted. The title is the Defendant’s standard.

With respect to the instant forest land, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on June 30, 1965 on the ground of sale on May 1, 1964 by the Incheon District Court Branch Kimpo-dong Office of the Incheon District Court under Article 7104 of the receipt of the Plaintiff’s father Kimpo-si Office of the Kimpo-si, and the Plaintiff’s ownership transfer registration was completed on March 16, 2015 on the ground of donation on March 16, 2015.

C. In 1972 and 1991, the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s fatherbow D and the Defendant’s fatherbed E died respectively, the descendants of the above deceased installed and buried the said deceased in the form of joint burial on the land of the instant forest.

On December 9, 198, the Defendant’s wife died on December 9, 199. The instant grave was installed and buried in the instant forest as well as the instant decedent, and as in the case of the said decedent, the network K (the Defendant’s fifth degree of son) and the network U husband and wife died, and the Defendant’s husband and wife died, and installed a joint grave by burying the instant forest with the consent of the deceased lineal ascendants and descendants, such as G and J. The descendants had visited the instant forest and installed a joint grave. The descendants had visited the instant forest and set up a joint grave with the view to protecting and serving for them.

E. On October 9, 2017, the Plaintiff excavated four graves of the deceased C couple, the deceased D couple’s joint grave, the deceased K couple’s joint grave, the deceased K couple’s joint grave, and the VC grave, the body and the Defendant’s large luxine. In relation to the case of the accusation regarding the excavation of graves, the Incheon District Prosecutors’ Office rendered a non-prosecution disposition on the ground that the Plaintiff was “suspected” or “suspected” against the Plaintiff.