logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.05.15 2019구단3028
자동차운전면허취소처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 13, 2018, at around 22:36, the Plaintiff, while under the influence of alcohol at a level of 0.078%, driven a cub vehicle B along the road on the five-lane roads in front of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, was driving along the road on the five-lane roads. The Plaintiff was driving through the cuber Park Intersection.

In such a case, the driver of a vehicle has a duty of care to live well on the front side and the left side of the vehicle and to safely operate the vehicle. However, the plaintiff, due to the negligence by the failure of bypassing the center line, has received the front part of the left side part of the E-learning Motor Vehicle driven by D (37 years old) which was driven by signal signal in the air from the first lane to the traffic signal of the two-lanes, and due to the shocking motor vehicle, the victim F (41 years old) who was driven by by bypassing along the two-lanes of the vehicle should get the front part of the vehicle.

The Plaintiff’s negligence caused injury to D, as seen above, to D, such as light d’s base for treatment for about two weeks; injury to H (the 59-year old), the passenger of the said firing vehicle, caused by brain-dead, etc. required for treatment for about three weeks; injury to F, such as light d’s base for treatment for about three weeks; injury to F, light d’s base for treatment; injury to I (the 45-year-old passenger of the said firs vehicle); injury to the firs vehicle; and injury to d’s base for treatment for about two weeks; injury to the fluor’s base for treatment for about eight weeks; even if the J, the passenger of the said firs vehicle, suffered injury to the firs vehicle’s base for treatment for about eight weeks, it immediately stopped and escaped without taking measures, such as aiding the victims.

B. The Defendant is the Plaintiff.

On December 2, 2018, the driver's license of the Plaintiff is Class I, common, and common, on December 2, 2018, on the ground that the Plaintiff did not take necessary measures, such as aiding and abetting the victims of a traffic accident.

arrow