logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.06.12 2015나2375
구상금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

The relevant parties are the insurer who entered into a motor vehicle comprehensive insurance contract with B on the motor vehicle for C (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff”) with B, and the Defendant is the driver of the DNA motor vehicle for D (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”).

On September 4, 2014, at around 13:50 on September 4, 2014, the Defendant: (a) driven the Defendant’s vehicle and proceeded in the direction of the upper high school in the direction of the two-dong, Seo-gu, Gwangju; (b) coming from the alleyway in front of the Korean hospital located in the left side of the running direction, and going through the intersection at the luminous ebbbbble; (c) the front pent part of the Plaintiff’s front gate was shocked to the front gate of the Defendant’s vehicle; and (d) the said accident (hereinafter “instant accident”) destroyed the front gate, etc. on the right side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

With respect to the instant accident, the Plaintiff paid insurance proceeds of KRW 2,647,070 to B, the insured, at the cost of repairing the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

[Grounds for recognition] In light of the above facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 6, and 7 (including virtual numbers) and the judgment on the claim cause of the entire pleadings, the accident location of this case is an intersection with no signal, etc., and the defendant caused the accident of this case, due to the negligence that caused the accident of this case, while neglecting the duty of care to properly examine the traffic situation of the front left and right in passing through the intersection with the defendant's vehicle, while driving the vehicle at the intersection with the driver's office, the defendant caused the accident of this case, which caused the shock of the plaintiff's vehicle that is directly going through the luminous dump from the back of the Mad Korean Hospital.

Therefore, the defendant has a duty to comply with the plaintiff's claim for indemnity that he paid insurance money to B due to the accident in this case.

However, the accident location in this case is an intersection with no traffic signal, etc.

arrow