1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Basic Facts

The Defendant, from April 2007 to April 2007, established and operated an authorized brokerage office of the name of “H Licensed Real Estate Agent Office” in Dong-gu Daejeon under the name of Dong-gu Daejeon Real Estate Agent Office under the name of Dong-gu, Daejeon Real Estate Agent Office.

On April 207, 2007, the defendant was requested from I to intermediate the purchase of the construction site for housing and purchased I by arranging the building site for 188.2m2m2 in Jung-gu, Daejeon. And I suggested I that I would remove common toilets necessary for multi-family housing and install toilets for each plan because the above land is converted into studio-type and leased in the university.

I newly constructed a third-story house on the above land (hereinafter referred to as the “instant house”) around September 2007, and obtained approval for use, and illegally remodeled as above. Upon completion of the instant house, the Defendant mediated the lease of the instant house under the name of son, which was the son.

D due to such change of use as above, it received a corrective order from the Jung-gu Office of Daejeon Metropolitan City on February 28, 2008, the corrective promotional order on May 12, 2008, and the corrective promotional order on May 19, 2008. On May 19, 2008, it received a corrective notice from the Jung-gu Office on May 19, 2008, and then received a corrective completion notice from the Jung-gu Office. Since the notice of completion of correction

around February 2, 2008, I requested C, who runs the real estate brokerage business under the trade name of K real estate in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul, to act as a broker for the sale and purchase of the instant house, and the contact information of the defendant was known to C, and C introduced the plaintiff to I as the purchaser. The plaintiff, along with C, was in the present situation of the instant house.

D) On April 1, 2008, between the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s broker, the sales contract was concluded between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff for the instant housing at KRW 480,000,000, and the contract was concluded under the present conditions, and the 112,800,00 the studio 21 deposit.