A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving off an off-to-land without a license plate and is a person who has an objection to the above.

On June 1, 2015, the Defendant driven the above Oral Ba, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, and came to enter the roads front of the air Force dormitory, which will cut off and deliver in the air force dormitory 5, 27 Do-ro, Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si, Do.

In such a case, despite the occupational duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the front side and the left side and accurately manipulating the steering direction and the brakes, the Defendant neglected to do so, and instead, went through to the left side from the right side of the running direction to the left side of the victim C (e.g., the 50-year-old bicycle driving) who is driving along the upper part of the bicycle driving along the upper part of the upper part.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as the closure of the body body frame, which was accompanied by the 12 weeks of non-alleys that require approximately 12 weeks of treatment, due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant of the traffic accident occurrence report, on-site map, the investigation report on the actual condition of the traffic accident, and on-site photograph.

1. The summary of the argument is that the defendant discovered the victim's bicycle at the time of the accident in this case, but the victim was faced with the victim while driving without discovering the error of driving the defendant, so the defendant did not neglect his duty of care.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated at the trial of the market, namely, ① the victim has consistently made a statement on the facts that the Defendant’s driver had suffered from the Defendant’s Obane since the investigative agency up to this court, and ②.