The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the purport of the grounds for appeal, such as the fact that the defendant committed contingently in the state of taking the appeal, the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim related to the obstruction of business, and the defendant commits the crime against the police, etc., the sentence (four months of imprisonment) imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. There are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may be newly considered after the pronouncement of the judgment below.

In this case, it is not reasonable that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable in light of the records of this case including the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, motive for crime, etc., and various sentencing conditions shown in the arguments and arguments, including the fact that the defendant was unable to obstruct the restaurant business and was dispatched to the police officers, and the defendant was sentenced to several times of a crime with violent inclinations, and the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence and was sentenced to a crime of this case without being involved in the suspended execution of official duties.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.