logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2016.11.25 2016고정344
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant operates accommodation business with the trade name of ‘DMoel' in Mapo City C.

1. On March 25, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.: around 21:15, the Defendant engaged in the conduct of arranging commercial sex acts, etc. by providing F with the place of sexual traffic so that he/she may sexual intercourse by requesting the customer E to see that the customer E is not a hosing.

2. He/she shall not commit any act of arranging sexual traffic, etc. in breach of the Act on the Regulation of Amusement Businesses Affecting Public Morals;

Nevertheless, the Defendant engaged in commercial sex acts such as arranging commercial sex acts by allowing 202 to conduct commercial sex acts in the Domoel, which is a temporary custom business place, such as the preceding paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on witness F and E’s statutory statement;

1. Article 19 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 10 (1) and 3 (1) of the Act on the Regulation of Amusement Businesses Affecting Public Morals;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act to bear litigation costs;

arrow