The Defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment of this case is publicly notified.

Indictment

1. Fraud against D;

A. On January 10, 2005, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that the Defendant would supply the victim D with a view to or ability to supply the 20 million won or more of the market price produced in the Jeju North-gu, Gwangju-gu, and that the Defendant would supply the victim D with a total purchase price of the 20 million won or more of the 20 million market price, etc. In addition, despite the fact that there was a significant defect in the performance of the 17th of the 200th of the 20th of the 20th of the 20th of the 20th of the 20th of the 2007th of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 1st of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 1st of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 1st of the 1st of the 1st of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 17th of the 3th of the 3th of the 2.

B. On February 23, 2005, the Defendant’s office located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu H is again the Defendant’s office.

Denating the victim for the same purpose as described in the subsection, and promising the victim to supply 20 million won or more to vehicles, etc., the victim’s 15 million won or more at the same place on the same day from the victim;

3. 11. At the same place, 5 million won was remitted respectively to a new bank account under the name of the defendant, and was given a total of 20 million won as the purchase price, such as before giving back the money.

2. On December 9, 2004, the Defendant against F, at the F’s office of operation as described in the above paragraph 1(1) above, falsely advertised the victim F, to the same effect as the description in paragraph 1(a) above, with respect to the quality and sales prospects of the pre-payment, etc. produced by the State F, the Defendant prepared a “general sales contract” between the victim and the victim, and the victim’s KRW 20 million on January 10, 2005, and KRW 10 million on January 4, 2005.