In the case of paragraph 1 of the judgment of the defendant, the crime of intimidation 2 to 4 shall be listed in attached Table 1 list of crimes, and paragraph 3 shall be listed.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On December 11, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of suspension of execution due to the crime of extortion at the Incheon District Court Branch Branch, etc. on May 24, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 24, 2014. On June 11, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor and three million won of fine on September 12, 2014 and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 8, 2015, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Gyeyang Prison Prison on April 8, 2015.

[Criminal facts]

1. Intimidation Defendant made up of less than 17,00 won out of the basic supply cost received by Defendant E at the office of the third floor auditor in C around July 2012, 201, the Defendant threatened the victims of welfare who are public officials in charge of welfare service, such as 17,00 won, by threatening a public official in charge of the affairs related to basic recipients of D viewing who want to drink. This is the same as thirth of drinking water that he want to drink, and by threatening a public official in charge of the affairs related to basic recipients of D viewing, by threateninging the public official in charge of the public official in charge of welfare, including 1,000 won once to 6th of the daily list of crimes in attached Form 1 to 15, 2015.

2. On September 19, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties was suspended from the Defendant’s mother’s primary recipient status in the first floor welfare team office at H Eup/Myeon office located in G on September 15:21, 2016, the Defendant requested that “I, the head of the welfare team at the above office, “I have to stop the basic living of the recipients, why we would have to stop, and why you would have to use it strongly,” and that “I, who is a public official in charge of the receipt of civil petitions belonging to the above office, request the Defendant, “I will change the Defendant’s place of civil petitioner who is outside the place where I would work, and I will talk with the head of the team and talk with him, while having not been aware of it properly.”