1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the first instance is set forth in Article 2-A.

(i) , (c);

(2) Except as described below, paragraphs (a) and (b) are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts in height:

A. The plaintiff's assertion (1) was conducted on July 4, 1985 for a total of 4 weeks of marine scoo training. Among the three-day maritime training, the plaintiff scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood 193.

2. 3. By July 1994, the military waterworks hospital was hospitalized in the National Armed Forces waterworks hospital. Since the discharge took place from July 23, 2008 to the private hospital, the military waterworks hospital was hospitalized in an emergency in the National Armed Forces waterworks hospital due to an unknown liverness in detail. Since the Plaintiff, who had no health-related disease at the time of the entrance, was exposed to the head's external wounds due to strong pressure and melting operations, the instant refusal disposition should be revoked unlawfully.

C. (A) The plaintiff worked for a special military unit from December 6, 1984 to August 6, 197, and received a marine scoo training for four weeks from July 1985. On December 3, 1985, the plaintiff received a certificate of multiple scoo training from the Korea Diplomatic Association. (2) From November 11, 1993, the plaintiff had symptoms such as a sudden food room, scoo, scoo, and two scoods.