logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.06.30 2016나2036476
물품대금
Text

1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

2...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company that manufactures and sells optical storage devices parts. The Defendant is a company that manufactures and sells semiconductors and electronic parts-related manufacturing and sales business. 2) The Plaintiff was ordered from September 2010 to November 2013 by the Defendant to produce and deliver them to the Defendant (hereinafter “instant parts”) (hereinafter “instant transactions”).

3) The above transactions ordered the Plaintiff at the end of each month to supply the following month volume to the Plaintiff at any time within the period of one month in proportion to the volume ordered by the Plaintiff. 4) Meanwhile, the instant parts produced by the Plaintiff were manufactured with specific specifications and specifications suitable for the parts manufactured by the Defendant, and thus, it is impossible to supply them to other companies except the Defendant.

B. On November 2013, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff that the instant part was produced by itself, and notified the Plaintiff that the order will be suspended after the next time (hereinafter “instant notice of discontinuance of transaction”).

On the other hand, the Plaintiff’s Staff A visited the Defendant on November 18, 2013 and visited the Defendant, and reported the following details to the Plaintiff’s representative director on November 19, 2013.

The annual plan: The plan of 3.5 million to 4,00,000-4, 2.8 million to 3,000,000 openings, 1,000,000-1,00,000-2, was explained that the plan of 1,00,000-2, was not promptly information, and that the plan of 1,00,000,000-2, was not immediately information: if the quantity is reduced, it would be able to demand the increase of the unit price from the DNA (Plaintiff) or must not be traded.

We see whether it is a matter of concern.

b. The uncertainty of the production of the defendant (the defendant) is too unfortunate and theme (the defendant is thought to make it difficult to do so).

arrow