All appeals filed by prosecutors and Defendant A shall be dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The reasoning of the appeal by the prosecutor (the defendant A: the imprisonment of eight months, the suspension of the execution of the sentence of eight months, and the confiscation) is too uneased and unfair.

B. The court below's reasons for appeal by Defendant A (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. We examine both the judgment on the grounds for appeal and the Defendant’s assertion of unreasonable sentencing.

The crime of this case was committed in such a way that it infringes on the rights of trademark rights holders and disturbs market trade order. The defendants were less likely to have committed the crime of this case on October 31, 201, which was sentenced to imprisonment of 8 months, and the execution of the punishment was completed on May 6, 201, and again committed the crime of this case for a period of repeated crimes against foreign tourists, who have been interested in the temporary release from the entrance of the store of this case and on the underground warehouse, and the crime of harming the snow paths of the control by using a crupt method, such as selling a more similar product manufactured in the above underground warehouse, and thus, the crime is not less than 4 times the quality of the crime. In particular, the defendants A had been sentenced to imprisonment of 3 months on May 31, 2011, and had no risk of repeating the crime of the above fake, such as the purchase of a fake product in Seoul, which had no risk of repeating the crime of this case on the part of the above defendants in the international market.

However, in the case of Defendant A, after the execution of the sentence of 8 months imprisonment was completed on May 6, 2012, Defendant A lives before the construction site.