The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The prosecutor of the grounds for appeal asserts that the penalty (7 million won of a fine) declared by the court below is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The crime of arranging sexual traffic is recognized that the crime of arranging sexual traffic does not have any social harm, such as the commercialization of women's sex and undermining sound sexual culture and good morals, and that the Defendant committed the crime of this case even if he/she had been under suspension of execution after having been sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on May 23, 2014, which was sentenced to imprisonment on May 23, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 31,

However, considering the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime; (b) there was no record of being punished for the same type of crime; (c) the period of running a commercial sex business establishment is relatively short; (d) there was a family member to provide support; and (e) the fact that there are no special circumstances or circumstances that may newly be considered in sentencing after the pronouncement of the lower judgment; and (d) there were no changes in the Defendant’s age, character and behavior; (b) the motive and circumstance of the instant crime; (c) the motive and circumstance of the instant crime; and (d) the method and method of the crime; and (e) the circumstances that are conditions for sentencing as indicated in the present argument and the record, it is not deemed unfair

3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.