The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the facts charged of this case on the ground that the Defendant’s act did not constitute a threat of the crime of intimidation, that is, a threat of the crime of intimidation, or a threat of harm sufficient

In so determining, the Prosecutor erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the violation of the rules of evidence and intimidation in the lower court’s determination as above.

One of the arguments, in light of the relevant legal principles and records, there is no such error in the judgment of the court below.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.