The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unfair because it is too unreasonable that the sentence (one million won in penalty) imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant shows the attitude of opposing the defendant's wrongness, and the defendant has no record of being subject to criminal punishment for the same crime.

In addition, the defendant does not constitute the property to be specified for the enforcement of the clan property against himself.

I think that the property has not been entered in the list of property, and that there has been malicious intent to evade compulsory execution to the defendant.

It does not seem that it does not appear.

However, the crime of this case is not less complicated in light of the following: (a) the defendant appeared on the date of the application for specification of property against him/her and prepared and submitted the above list without stating the land on which the registration of sharing shares has been completed; and (b) the submission of false list of property with regard to the circumstances and contents of the crime; and (c) the submission of false list of property with regard to the order for specification of property makes it difficult for the creditor to remedy by force of the

In light of the above conditions unfavorable or favorable to the defendant, the circumstances after the crime, the age of the defendant, sexual conduct, environment, and all other factors of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, the punishment imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable, and thus, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.