logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2017.04.26 2016고정163
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a motor vehicle B's lurged vehicle.

On May 19, 2016, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol 0.087% during blood transfusion around 22:49, was driving the said vehicle at the section of about 1km of approximately 39 meters in distance to the front of the 39th National Sports Center for the People of the Republic of Korea, starting from the front door of the 52 large-ro, Ma-ro, Ma-ro, Ma-ro, Ma-ro, Ma-ro, 52, Ma-ro, Ma-ro, Ma-ro.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to notify the detailed statement of the driver in charge of driving and the result of regulating drinking;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) (excluding punishment) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. The summary of the facts charged (2016 Ray 163) The Defendant is a person who drives Crocketing car strings.

On May 17, 2016, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol level of 0.094% among the blood transfusions around 22:05, and was driving the said vehicle at a section of about 3 km in distance from the company which was in the jurisdiction of the Gyeonggi-si Hoho-si, Yacheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, to the front side of the head of the Hocheon-si, Yacheon-si, the Defendant started to operate the said vehicle at a section of about 3 km in distance from the

2. As to this part of the facts charged, the prosecutor revoked the public prosecution on the second public trial date, and the decision to dismiss this part of the public prosecution under Article 328 (1) 1 of the Criminal Procedure Act shall be made, but as long as the prosecution is found guilty on the remaining facts charged, this part of the public prosecution shall also be dismissed by judgment.

arrow