logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.06.20 2014고단2525
장물취득
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A sent a signal to a taxi driver by means of protruding a mobile phone light at the new wall time against the taxi that enters Seoul from overcheon, etc., and purchased a lost mobile phone that other customers get on the taxi as if they were customers, and sold the fact to F.

On March 22, 2014, at around 02:45, the Defendant acquired the 30,000 won of stolen goods from the above B, even though he knows that it was a stolen goods that embezzled possession of stolen goods, the Defendant acquired the 50,000 won of stolen goods in front of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

On March 22, 2014, the Defendant purchased 8 smartphones from around 02:45 to April 1, 201:25, in the same manner eight times, as indicated in the attached crime list, and acquired stolens by purchasing 435,000 won from around 02:45 to April 1, 2014.

2. Defendant B is an article that drives H taxi.

On March 22, 2014, the Defendant embezzled the Defendant’s thought that he had without following the required procedures, such as returning the Defendant’s 5 smartphone 5 smartphone, which caused the damage to the said taxi in operation, on the front of the tunnel No. 3 of Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each police interrogation protocol against I, J, K, L, M, N, orO;

1. Statement of the police about P;

1. Police seizure records;

1. A unit price table for mobile phone purchase;

1. Specific taxi that purchases mobile phones;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the comprehensive details of photographs and vehicles;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent legal provision on criminal facts: each of the Criminal Code Article 362(1)(the acquisition of stolens and the choice of imprisonment): Defendant B: Article 360 of the Criminal Code.

arrow