Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If a fine is not paid, 50,000 won shall be converted into one day.

Punishment of the crime

Around 2011, the Defendant requested the Defendant to trade the “E Real Estate” operated by the Victim D(60 years of age) located in the Guri-si, Guri-si (hereinafter “instant Real Estate”) to Francis 202 at the time of Guri-si (hereinafter “instant Real Estate”).

On January 11, 2012, the Defendant would arrange to sell the instant real estate from the victim in KRW 230,000,000. The Defendant would like to request KRW 25,000,000 under the pretext of the case, and paid KRW 15,00,000 under the case title to the victim.

On January 12, 2012, the Defendant concluded a sales contract for the instant real estate as an intermediary with the victim’s “E Real Estate” and concluded that he would make a payment of honorarium KRW 5,00,000 to the victim who received a request from the victim, and then delivered KRW 5,00,000 to the victim in cash.

Accordingly, the Defendant paid 5,00,000 won exceeding 2,930,000 won to the victim with regard to the sale and purchase of the instant real estate.

Criminal facts

around 11:00 on February 29, 2012, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant received KRW 5,000,000 in connection with the sale and purchase of the instant real estate from the “E Real Estate” to the victim in excess of the statutory brokerage commission. The Defendant also recorded, and witnessed. The Defendant paid KRW 1,00,000,000 and changed the creation of the Hyundai Card 15.”

On March 2, 2012, at around 17:50 on March 2, 2012, the Defendant shown a written statement prepared by G as at the site when delivering KRW 5,00,000 to the victim with “E Real Estate”, and, if the victim does not accept the Defendant’s request, expressed an attitude that a licensed real estate agent would report to the competent authority on the receipt exceeding the statutory brokerage commission.

On March 7, 2012, the Defendant received 2,930,000 won from the head of the Tong in the name of the Defendant for the purpose of returning the amount received in excess of the amount from the frighter victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. A witness D.