Defendants shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 1, 2015, at around 18:00, Defendant A found that the market value of the victim’s 800,000 won owned by the victim of Samsung Gal juno-No-4 mobile phones and the market value of Samsung Gal gal ju City, the sum of which is equivalent to the KRW 638,000, is far away from the way of the road, and Defendant A embezzled the property that was brought to the victim’s possession without going through necessary procedures, such as returning it to the victim or filing a report on the acquisition of the victim’s body at the neighboring police station.

2. On January 2015, Defendant B received a request from Defendant B to sell Samsung Tgal jumian 4 mobile phone units owned by the victim as described in the preceding paragraph and two cell phone units owned by A during the course of Samsung Ggal jumian.

On January 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) knew of the fact that the mobile phone price of the above three mobile phone is the stolen goods in Daegu Dong-gu E, Daegu; (b) asked F business owners C to dispose of the said mobile phone; and (c) provided the above stolen goods to arrange the transfer of stolen goods.

3. Defendant C is the owner of “F” in Daegu Dong-gu E, and G is the employee of the said F.

On January 1, 2015, at around 14:00, the Defendant received two mobile phones of Samsung Ggal jugnogian and Samsung Ggal ju City, which were owned by the victim by A upon the request of sale from B as described in the preceding paragraph, from the above “F.”

On February 17, 2015, at around 19:10, the Defendant: (a) taken a vehicle driven by G in front of the opening-gu, Busan Dong-dong urban railroad No. 4, Dong-dong, Busan, and attempted to sell the said mobile phone to a person who is not aware of his name; but (b) was discovered to arrange the transfer of stolen goods.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol of suspect examination of G police officers;

1. Written statements of D;

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of seized articles;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: The indictment is written in Article 360 of the Criminal Act.