logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.02.07 2017고단3450
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On February 10, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act at Seoul Southern District Court on October 10, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 18, 2017. On October 10, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for perjury in the same court on August 18, 2017, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 18, 2017.

[Criminal facts] No person shall provide game water of a content different from the game water classified by the Game Water Management Committee for the distribution or use, or display or store for such purpose.

On July 2014, the Defendant: (a) installed nine computers in the “EP” operated with D in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, and the first floor; (b) provided the games such as “new game face,” “new game spacker,” “new game spacker,” “new game spacker,” and “new game spacker,” and (c) provided the games with “free game rating,” and (d) provided the game with “it is impossible to charge game money” by the Game Water Management Committee, i.e., “F., employees who received instructions from the Defendant and D, despite being classified into a free game rating,” but around April 20, 2015, the Defendant provided G with a 20,000 won cash phone to charge 20,000 won and 200,000 won of the said game money to G to 15,200,000 won of the said games.

As a result, in collusion with partners D and employees F, the Defendant provided game water of different contents from the game water classified by the game water management committee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of a suspect of F or D by the prosecution;

1. Each statement of H and G;

1. Protocols of seizure and list of seizure, photographs of room rooms, photographs of room room business places and copies of books of business place;

1. An explanatory note of the contents of interpellation and a revised statement of new game;

arrow