logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.02.10 2014고단1895
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who has worked as a lending consultant in Gwangju Metropolitan City from July 2012 to February 2014.

In order to raise more profits by working as a lending consultant, the Defendant produced a lapping case, which is set up at the height of a domestic well-known lending company, and intended to distribute it through the Gogle-ro World Market.

1. No person violating the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. shall collect another person's information or induce another person to provide information through information and communications networks;

Nevertheless, from November 19, 2013 to February 7, 2014, the Defendant manufactured a loan inquiry and consultation display case in the name of “C”, “Chyp”, “Chump”, “SC Savings Bank”, and “SCpump Bank” in the name of “D”, which is an agent for the production of fryp capital, from November 19, 2013 to February 7, 2014.

However, as seen above, the term "clater" posted by the Defendant was not a normal term "clater" manufactured and distributed upon permission or request from each Capital Company or Bank.

As above, the Defendant illegally produced and posted a glance company and bank falsely, and then collected 1,108 personal information, including the name of an unspecified number of people, cell phone numbers, etc., by allowing many unspecified persons to enter personal information in the “counseling of counseling” camera bulletin board.

Accordingly, the defendant collected information from another person through the information communication room.

2. Any person who violates the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act, and any person who violates the Trademark Act shall use the same or similar mark as another person's name, trade name, or emblem, or any other mark indicating another person's business widely known in the Republic

arrow