1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. The Plaintiffs asserted that Defendant Q Q (hereinafter “Defendant Q”) had engaged in cryp currency transactions in the cryp currency exchange, which was established by around March 20, 2018. Defendant R was the management who operated Defendant Q as Defendant Q’s representative director, and Defendant Q as Defendant Q’s in-house director.

T means, around August 20, 2018, 500 billion won of the ccops (CAP) (hereinafter referred to as “fcops”) issued around 20,000 won. ① The facts do not have the intent or ability to actually use an overseas exchange or to close ccos in daily life, but do so through white papers, Internet homepage, etc. around January 2019, and create an ecosystem that can be used by ccos in daily life from around February 2019. ② The facts are as follows: (a) although there was no intention or ability to continuously maintain the mining function, profit distribution function, ccos and voting function on the ccos, and (b) there was no intention or ability to capture the Plaintiff’s 10 ccos or to capture the Plaintiff’s ccos from the ccos to the effect that the Plaintiff’s ccos do not purchase the ccos in the same way as the Plaintiff’s ccos.

Thus, pursuant to Articles 389, 210, and 401(1) of the Commercial Act and Article 760 of the Civil Act, Defendant Q, its representative director, and Defendant R and Defendant S, a stock company, are jointly and severally liable to pay damages and losses for delay to the Plaintiffs as stated in the purport of each claim.

2. According to each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 2 and 3, the bl. Bags issued by T in relation to the functions or vision of the caps.