1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff falling under the order of additional payment shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning of this court's explanation is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, since Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the dismissal of the claim No. 6, No. 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance and the claim No. 7, No. 7

2. Parts in height:

(a) Except as otherwise stated below, the entry in each of the corresponding items in the Schedule for Calculation of Actual Income in Annex A, and the period for the convenience of calculation shall, in principle, be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the discount method that deducts the interim interest calculated at the rate of 5/12 per month.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments have not been separately explained.

(2) The actual income during the period of suspension (from November 27, 2014 to March 18, 2015): The actual income during the period of suspension (attached Form 1, 2076, 541) (attached Form 1, 17, 305, 11: 17, 305, 159 (attached Form 3 to 63) (the aggregate of the actual income calculation table), 1,245, 205, 300 won (the aggregate of the actual income calculation table), 205, 159 won (the aggregate of the actual income calculation table) after the suspension period of suspension of business, 1,245, 205, 159 won (the aggregate of the actual income calculation table) after the suspension of business, 305, 205, 205, 306, 146, 205, 305, 146, 2536, 140