The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) the Defendant’s response to the disease of the victim who is subject to the donation of the light-of-copic pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary Prohibition (hereinafter “PTINR”) caused the victim’s blood transfusion, and caused the victim’s pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary Precaution

2. Determination

A. From May 2009 to November 28, 2010, the Defendant served as a medical specialist in blood species and majors at the D Hospital.

A victim E (the age of 51, female) was hospitalized in a F Hospital due to symptoms, such as scarcity, heat, scarcity, etc., and the symptoms worsen, and was suspected of being "pathosome leuk typosis" after being hospitalized in the Repulmonary department of D Hospital on December 26, 2009, and was subject to CT’s pulmonary resuscitation on January 6, 2010. Since the heat continued and the infection cannot be ruled out, the victim E (the age of 51, female) moved to the pulmonary department of image and the pulmonary department of D Hospital on February 14:30, 2010 to the pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary typ.

CT-D HH HH HH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHE 50,00 or less patients, or where there is a blood risk, such as a response system, it constitutes a gold donation.

During the period between 7 to 10 days after the administration of an anti-climatic cancer to the victim, it is possible to suppress the function of blood transfusion, which leads to a decrease in the blood plate, and when the blood plate decreases, the blood tendency has increased.

The victim on January 27, 2010