The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Basic Facts

The plaintiff is a stock company that runs real estate brokerage and service business, and the defendant is a stock company that runs export and import business, real estate trading, lease and parking lot business.

The Defendant concluded, on October 14, 201, a lease consulting service agreement with the Plaintiff and its said building scheduled to be newly constructed (hereinafter “instant new building lease agreement”) on six parcels of land in Gangnam-gu, Seoul and 148-1, and eight parcels of land (hereinafter “instant parcels of land”) owned by the Defendant, and three parcels of land are owned by the representative director of the Defendant company and their family members; hereinafter “each of the instant parcels of land”); hereinafter “each of the instant parcels of land”) for the purpose of business facilities, cultural and assembly facilities, and neighborhood living facilities (hereinafter “instant new building lease business”).

(A) Services to be provided by the Plaintiff under the instant consulting contract are ① establishment of a marketing plan for lease, ② advertisement and public relations activities for lease, ③ all kinds of business activities for finding lessees, ④ contractual terms and conditions and duty to negotiate prices for the conclusion of a lease contract, ⑤ all business activities for legal and tax-related consultation and litigation settlement, ⑥ services for the conclusion of a lease contract and the follow-up settlement of litigation, • business feasibility review and business planning, 8 preparation of basic brate establishment and business plan of a building, 9 design and authorization support, 00 other services-related activities.

(A) On February 13, 2013, with respect to six parcels of land owned by the Defendant, a lease agreement was concluded between Korea-free shopping company (hereinafter “Korea-free shopping”) and monthly rent of KRW 250,000,000, and from February 15, 2013 to February 28, 2014 with respect to each of the instant parcels of land, and the Defendant continued to implement the development project, such as construction deliberation by the relevant administrative agencies, while promoting the construction and lease project of the instant building.

However, each of the lands of this case.