A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months and a fine not exceeding 900,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 23, 2014, the Defendant: (a) received a disposition of notification of free and free of charge in the vicinity of the Sung-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu; and (b) did not pay the penalty up to the day after receiving the notification of free and free of charge in the Sung-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu., Seo-gu.

Ⅱ. On March 12, 2014, the Defendant of the 2016 Highest 429 (Seoul Highest 429) was notified of the disposition of free riding and free riding on the street near the Northwest-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, and did not pay the penalty up to the day.

Ⅲ The Defendant, around 16:51 on March 13, 2014, of the 2016 Highest 430, the Defendant was notified of the disposition of non-standing and non-exclusive acquisition in the vicinity of the Seongbuk-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, and then did not pay the penalty up to the day.

IV. The Defendant, at around April 17, 2014, notified on April 17, 2014, as a result of an act of creating unstable in the East-gu East East East-dong area, Namcheon-gu, Seoul, and did not pay the penalty up to the day.

V. The Defendant, at around 06:00 on May 2, 2014, 2014, was notified of the instant disposition due to an act of disturbance in the Dong department in the Dong department in the Southern-gu, Southern-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul, and did not pay the penalty up to the day.

VI. The Defendant, “2016 Highest 460, 2016, the Defendant, at around 16:30 on April 5, 2014, was notified of the disposition due to unauthorized Access in the Seocheon-gu, Southern-gu, Seocheon-gu, the Namcheon-gu, and did not pay the penalty until then.

VII. The Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment on November 26, 2014 with labor for forced indecent acts, etc. in the Daejeon District Court’s 2016 High Order 786, and the execution of the sentence was terminated until November 8, 2015, which became final and conclusive on April 29, 2015 (which was dismissed by the prosecution’s appeal). From April 13, 2016 to November 7, 2020, the Defendant was subject to the electronic device attachment order and the protective observation.

1. Violation of the Act on the Protection and Observation of Specific Criminal Offenders and the Electronic Monitoring, etc. of Electronic Devices;

(a) A person who has an electronic device installed to impair the utility of the electronic device shall be free of discretion from his body during the period of attachment of the electronic device;