logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.12.15 2016나12129
채무부존재확인
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. Disposition No. 3 of the judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

The reasoning of this Court is that the reasoning of the first instance judgment is the same as that of the first instance judgment, except for the first instance judgment’s changing the “as of April 14, 2014” of the first instance judgment No. 4, 6, 8, and 6, respectively, to “as of April 14, 2014,” and changing the “as of May 14, 2013” of the sixth, 6, 6, and 16, to “as of May 14, 2014,” and thus, it is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed, and the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed. However, since there is any error in the text of the judgment of the court of first instance, each of the "from May 14, 2014" as "from May 14, 2014" as "from May 14, 2014," and the Disposition No. 5 as "3." "4." "4." and Disposition No. 11. 4." and Disposition No. 11. 13. 5." are revised as "6." and Disposition No. 13. 6." and Disposition No. 16. 7. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow